Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hewlett v. Shaffer et al
as 6:2014cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael A Hewlett
Defendant:
Scotty R Shaffer, Robert Danford, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. South Central Steel, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tommie L. McCall
Defendant:
South Central Steel, Inc., Robert Danford, Joey Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Danford et al
as 1:2012cv02476
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Ronald Sellers, Jeff Ragsdale and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Danford et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Ronald Sellers, Jeff Ragsdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Danford
as 1:2012cv00207
Petitioner:
Ercell Manuel, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Danford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Danford et al
as 2:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Terry Donnell Watson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, State of Alabama, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Bentley et al
as 2:2011cv04348
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Perkins
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Robert Danford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Danford et al
as 2:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
Carl Lockhart
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Kim Thomas and Sellers
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fretwell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2010cv02872
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fretwell
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Terventius Gibbs, Robert Danford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
