Cases 31 - 40 of 201
Blazer v. Dooley et al
as 4:2017cv04045
Plaintiff:
Robert A Blazer
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Director of Prison Industries, Denny Kaemingk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kane v. Reisch et al
as 4:2017cv04007
Plaintiff:
James Wrey Kane
Defendant:
Tim Reisch, Melinda Johnson, Douglas Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Dooley et al
as 1:2017cv01001
Petitioner:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Marty J. Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bissonette v. Dooley et al
as 5:2016cv05120
Petitioner:
Danny D. Bissonette
Respondent:
Robert Dooley , David Gilbertson and Craig A. Pfeifle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Irving Dale v. CBM Correctional Food Services, et al
as 16-4542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Irving Dale
Defendant - Appellee:
CBM Correctional Food Services, Darin Young, Warden at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in his individual and offical capacity, Robert Dooley, Warden at MDSP and Director of Prison Operations for South Dakota Department of Corrections, in his individual and offical capacity and others
Klaudt v. Dooley et al
as 3:2016cv03047
Petitioner:
Ted Alvin Klaudt
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Lawrence Long and Patricia J. Devaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Ray Corder v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-4325
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ronald Ray Corder
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, also known as Bob and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Krabbenhoft v. Dooley et al
as 4:2016cv04149
Petitioner:
Robbie D. Krabbenhoft
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricky Sieler v. Robert Dooley
as 16-3957
Petitioner:
Ricky Jay Sieler
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
