Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Ward v. Ives et al
as 2:2011cv01657
Plaintiff:
John C. Ward
Defendant:
Richard Ives, Jay Salinas, Ryan Binford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tony Alexander v. D. Lorance, et al
as 11-16393
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY B. ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
D. LORANCE, DHO, Western Regional Office, STOKES, SOS, USP Atwater, DAVENPORT, SOS, USP Atwater and others
Trent Brewer et al v. Tereser A Bank et al
as 2:2011cv04100
Respondent:
Tereser A Bank, Robert E McFadden and T C Outlaw
Petitioner:
Trent Brewer
Alexander v. Lorance et al
as 1:2011cv00593
Petitioner:
Tony B. Alexander
Respondent:
D. Lorance , - Stokes , - Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Fisher, et al.
as 1:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Alexander
Defendant:
Fisher , Luke , D Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams Jr v. Thomas et al
as 3:2011cv06015
Petitioner:
Ronald Morris Adams Jr
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Robert E. McFadden, Randy McWilliams, Kevin Straight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
David Bryant
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Robert E. MCFadden, Francisco J. Quintana and others
Alberto Del Muro v. Fernando Arriola, et al
as 10-56582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO JOSE DEL MURO
Defendant - Appellee:
FERNANDO ARRIOLA, Warden, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Regional Director, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator National and others
Ocadio v. US Department of Justice, et al
as 2:2010cv02597
Plaintiff:
Vicente Miranda Ocadio
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Harley G. Lappin, Robert E. McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 10-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SLA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
