Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Wilson v. TDCJ Personnel et al
as 9:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sonny Wilson
Defendant:
TDCJ Personnel, Robert Eason, Hai Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Howard v. Robert Eason, et al
as 16-11808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX JARAUN HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EASON, MICHAEL UPSHAW, PAUL MORALES and others
Jeffrey Haufler v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-41640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY HAUFLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, BRAD LIVINGSTON, ROBERT EASON and others
Haufler v. Stephens et al
as 6:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haufler
Defendant:
William Stephens, Charles Grasti, Raymond Carlos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. TDCJ et al
as 3:2015cv01365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Glenn King
Defendant:
TDCJ, University of Texas Medical Branch, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Howard v. Robert Eason, et al
as 15-10082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX JARAUN HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EASON, MICHAEL UPSHAW, PAUL MORALES and others
McCollum et al v. Livingston et al
as 3:2014cv03991
Plaintiff:
Stephen McCollum , Stephanie Kingrey and Sandra McCollum
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , Jeff Pringle , Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Eason et al
as 7:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Defendant:
Robert Eason, Michael Upshaw, Paul Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph Bowden v. Stephen Sims, et al
as 14-40791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH BOWDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN SIMS, RAYMOND HENDRIX, DANIEL BATT and others
Caddell v. Livingston et al
as 3:2014cv02249
Plaintiff:
Bradley Caddell
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , William Stephens , Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
