Cases 1 - 10 of 58
King v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward King
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03300
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02839
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
US v. Robert Tillery
as 23-6282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT EDWARD TILLERY
Stewart v. Booth et al
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Destiny Danielle Stewart
Defendant:
Scott Allan Booth and Robert Edward Raines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Terrance Hammock v. Gail Watts
as 21-7643
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRANCE EDWARD HAMMOCK
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, STATE ATTORNEY MICHAEL W. FULLER, JUDGE ROBERT EDWARD CAHILL, JR. and others
Schlesinger v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03617
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Schlesinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Robert Claytor
as 21-7192
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT EDWARD CLAYTOR
Eckman v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00127
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Eckman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
