Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LeBlanc v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00204
Petitioner:
Robert Glenn LeBlanc, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glenn v. Probate Court of Denton County et al
as 4:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Launius Robert Glenn
Defendant:
Probate Court of Denton County, Richard Douglas Ranne and Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glenn v. Probate Court of Denton County et al
as 3:2017cv00456
Petitioner:
Launius Robert Glenn
Respondent:
Probate Court of Denton County, Richard Douglas Ranne and Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miranda et al v. American Blasting Technology et al
as 4:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Lusvin Miranda and Jose Armando Rivera
Defendant:
American Blasting Technology, Robert Glenn Falke, Belinda Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glenn et al v. Ranne et al
as 3:2016cv03202
Plaintiff:
Launius Robert Glenn and Anita Doris Glenn
Defendant:
Richard Douglas Ranne, Wayne Keith Ranne, Donald Lee Ranne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glenn v. Methodist Charlton Medical Center
as 3:2016cv03131
Petitioner:
Launius Robert Glenn
Respondent:
Methodist Charlton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LeBlanc v. Kimbrought
as 1:2014cv00253
Petitioner:
Robert Glenn LeBlanc
Respondent:
John Kimbrought
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapa et al v. Empire Scaffold, LLC
as 1:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eduardo Chapa , All Plaintiffs , Brice Delaine Christian and others
Defendant:
Empire Scaffold, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Upton
as 1:2009cv00697
Petitioner:
Robert Glenn Brown, Jr
Respondent:
Jody Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Viesca v. Belo Wiley et al
as 5:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Christina Viesca
Defendant:
Belo Wiley, Wiley Lease Co., Ltd., Business Staffing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
