Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
Steven Robert Hamilton
Defendant:
United States of America, Merrick Garland, US Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hamilton v. BAS Capital Corp et al
as 3:2021cv01065
Defendant:
BAS Capital Corp., Bruce A Stein and BAS Capital Corp
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atrean Davis et al v. Legend Energy Services LLC
as 6:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Kevin Intiso , Salah Ali , Ray Alli and others
Defendant:
Legend Energy Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hamilton et al v. American International Group et al
as 2:2009cv08340
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamilton and Roy C. Smith
Defendant:
American International Group, Starr Excess Liability Insurance Company, Ltd., American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamilton et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08315
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Hamilton, Donnell Tucker, Gwendolyn Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Severally Subscribing to Policy No. 22252 v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2009cv00714
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Severally Subscribing to Policy No. 22252 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Severally Subscribing to Policy No. 22252
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton and William P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Walker et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03898
Plaintiff:
Barbara Walker, Barbara Walker, Alvin Mosley, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
