Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PEARSON-HUMPHREY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv04593
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ANNA LOUISE PEARSON-HUMPHREY and ROBERT HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17712
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60070
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUMPHREY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphrey v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv04504
Plaintiff:
Robert Humphrey
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphrey v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv01155
Plaintiff:
Robert Humphrey
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abraham et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11804
Plaintiff:
Victor Cantelmo, Lysette Rivera, Shirley R Rausher and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Giambrone et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11525
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. Ginley, Robert Humphrey, Patrick Halloran and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Paskevicius v. Humphrey
as 8:2017cv01895
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Paskevicius
Defendant:
Barry Robert Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batts et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01243
Plaintiff:
Stanley Batts, Courtney J. Cain, Joanne Clinton and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
