Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Palato v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2007cv01280
Petitioner:
Juan Jose Palato
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Robert J Okin, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Wince v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01572
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wince
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Coto v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2007cv01002
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Celestino Coto
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mendez-Rosales v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00952
Defendant:
Robert J Okin, Alberto Gonzalez, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alejandro Mendez-Rosales
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Chouari v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00954
Defendant:
Eduardo Aguirre, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Ghazouan Chouari
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
