Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Robert John Olson v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Robert John Olson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robert John King v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Robert John King
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
"Lily" v. Little
as 3:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
"Lily"
Defendant:
Robert John Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(PC) Bustillos v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Robert John Bustillos
Defendant:
Hernandez, Cabrillo, Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00717
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ratt v. WBS, Inc., et al
as 21-55978
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RATT, a California General Partnership
Defendant / Appellant:
WBS, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant:
ROBERT JOHN BLOTZER, an individual, JOHN DOMAGALL, an individual, ARM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Robert Adkins v. Lance Hetmer, et al
as 21-15717
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT JOHN ADKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
LANCE HETMER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Robert John Olson v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert John Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robert Garcia v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 20-56241
Respondent / Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and K. DRYSOL, Associal Warden, CIM-A Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT JOHN GARCIA
Hegge et al v. Inslee et al
as 3:2020cv06170
Defendant:
Erin Lystad, Richard Estes, William Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Ziegler, Sergio Peralta, Alvin L Hegge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
