Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Zurbriggen et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05648
Plaintiff:
Thor Zurbriggen, Dena Catan, Christina H. Endicott and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition, Inc., American Airlines Group Inc., Envoy Air Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00714
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
USA and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv50058
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. New NGC, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10166
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
New NGC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Johnson v. Mercer Transportation Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00323
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Mercer Transportation Company Inc and Susan Whitehouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. United States et al
as 1:2014cv03836
Plaintiff:
Jose Banks
Defendant:
United States , John Doe, Catherine Linaweaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharamceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51345
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharamceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05869
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Hill et al v. Rubald et al
as 1:2013cv04847
Plaintiff:
Demetris Hill and Kameo Hill
Defendant:
Zachary Rubald, Robert Johnson and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04757
Plaintiff:
Judy Johnson and John Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
