Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Andrews v. York et al
as 3:2023cv02294
Plaintiff:
William Andrews
Defendant:
Charlie York, Robert Johnson and Elmer Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brothers v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv03379
Petitioner:
Clayton Tuttle Brothers
Respondent:
Harris County, Judge Robert Johnson and Harris County CSCD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
J.B. Black
Defendant:
Judge Robert Johnson, Judge Hazel B Jones and Attorney Jerome Godinich Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrews v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
William Andrews
Defendant:
Robert Johnson, Daniel McAninch and Jacob Palos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
William Andrews
Defendant:
Robert Johnson, Daniel McAninch and Jacob Palos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Kerry Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Robert Johnson, Eric M Bruss, Wayne Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stephens et al
as 1:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Shawnburger and FNU Guillory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv02306
Plaintiff:
Dimitric A. Knight
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ards v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Warden Crowley, D.A. Kim Ogg, Warden J Gauna and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton L Ards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
