Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tracy v. Ray et al
as 1:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
Terance Albert Tracy
Defendant:
Robert Joseph Ray, Robert Jones Jr. and Board of Elections Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Somers v. Devine et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Brooke Somers and Brooke N. Somers
Defendant:
Anthony Devine, John Roush, Robert Joseph Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Ventura Granados v. Bd3 Design, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv00579
Plaintiff:
Jose Ventura Granados
Defendant:
Bd3 Design, LLC and Robert Joseph Deleonibus, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King v. Neall et al
as 8:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Brian E. Frosh, Marian Fogan, Devita Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
King v. Onwaunabe et al
as 8:2017cv01654
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Onwaunabe and Schrumpf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Mitchell et al
as 8:2016cv03804
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell , John Robison , Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02166
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph McLaughlin
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McMahon v. County Commissioners of Kent County et al
as 1:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darek Michael McMahon
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Kent County , Kent County Sheriff's Office , Kent County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tunnell v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2011cv03651
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Tunnell
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tunnell v. Harford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv03219
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Tunnell
Respondent:
Harford County Detention Center and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
