Cases 1 - 10 of 491
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis and Stephen E. Toner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Morgan, IV v. USA
as 24-11151
Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS MORGAN, IV
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE and ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Morgan, Robert Lewis v. Unknow Broward County Sheriff Deputies et al
as 1:2024cv21422
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Morgan and Robert Lewis Morgan Jr.
Defendant:
Unknow Broward County Sheriff Deputies, Unknown Metro-Dade Police Officers, David Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendrick Lovett v. Donald Lewis, et al
as 24-10838
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK DEON LOVETT
Defendant:
DONALD ROBERTS LEWIS, STEPHEN E. TONER and UNKNOWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis, Stephen E. Toner and Unknown Female State Prosecutor /Assistant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv20818
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis, Stephen E. Toner and Unknown Female State Prosecutor /Assistant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
