Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tung et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv02590
Plaintiff:
Crystal Tung and Jiayou Luo
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pounds v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv01021
Petitioner:
Robert Nicholas Pounds
Respondent:
Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States v. Robert Hansen
as 23-2188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Nicholas Hansen
United States v. Robert Hansen
as 23-2189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Nicholas Hansen
SAMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05353
Plaintiff:
ROBERT NICHOLAS SAMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GREER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
ROBERT NICHOLAS GREER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gao et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2022cv05555
Plaintiff:
Shou Cai Gao and Yue Gao
Defendant:
Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Secretary of State Antony Bliken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nicholas v. National General Insurance Co
as 6:2022cv04645
Plaintiff:
Robert Nicholas
Defendant:
National General Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
