Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Darryl McGore v. Cindi Curtin, et al
as 11-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MCGORE
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDI CURTIN, UNKNOWN BALL, UNKNOWN SHARP and others
McGore #142739 et al v. Curtin et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739 and Michael Anderson #260826
Defendant:
Cindi Curtin, Unknown Ball, Unknown Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2011cv03090
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Strong
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David McKune, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGore # 142739 et al v. Krajenik et al
as 1:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739, Tomika D. Shaw #266188, Robert Fields #255682 and others
Defendant:
Unknown Krajenik, Robert Sanders, Unknown Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers #459083 v. Bowers et al
as 1:2010cv01137
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Summers #459083
Defendant:
Loraine Bowers, Cindi Curtin, Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw #266188 v. Curtin et al
as 1:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
Tomika D. Shaw #266188
Defendant:
Cindi Curtin, Robert Sanders, Rick Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownfield v. Sanders et al
as 5:2010cv03166
Petitioner:
Chris Allen Brownfield
Respondent:
Robert Sanders and Kansas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Seaton #322788 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2010cv00595
Plaintiff:
Ronald Seaton #322788
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Richard Stapleton, James Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 1:2010cv01149
Petitioner:
Cyrus Robert Sanders
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seaton v. Caruso et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv11660
Plaintiff:
Ronald Seaton
Defendant:
Patricia L Caruso, Richard Stapleton, James Armstrong and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
