Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01698
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, James C. Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. IYOGI, INC.
as 2:2015cv03724
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
IYOGI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv02865
Plaintiff:
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
ROBERT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELOACH v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv02338
Petitioner:
BRAETTA DELOACH
Respondent:
ROBERT SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAXON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2014cv06037
Petitioner:
JEAN SAXON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. SMITH
as 2:2014cv00586
Petitioner:
JENNIFER SMITH
Respondent:
ROBERT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dougherty v. Advanced Wings LLP et al
as 1:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Keith Dougherty
Defendant:
Advanced Wings LLP , Stratus Aviation LLC, Regis de Ramel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMITH v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
ROBERT SMITH
Respondent:
BOBBY MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ANDERSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv04866
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. ANDERSON , LORAIN A. ANDERSON , NEWTON L. BALL and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KENNEY v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KENNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CHIEF OF POLICE NATHAN HARPER, OFFICER MATTHEW TURKO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
