Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gallegos et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anna Gallegos and Ben Cannon
Defendant:
Robert Smith and Saddle Creek Logistics Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
C R BARD, Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Shenzhen Geekvape Technology Co., Ltd
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith and Amber Smith
Defendant:
Shenzhen Geekvape Technology Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Busby et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv01136
Defendant:
Robert Smith and DNCJB LLC
Plaintiff:
Amanda Busby and David Hays
Interested Party:
Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 5:2015cv00375
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith and Heather Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Chubb & Son
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01929
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv10426
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk Southern Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
as 2:2014cv10425
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corporation
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Renick v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Roger Renick
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Joe A. Lane and State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
