Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Engwall et al v. Tinsley et al
as 8:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Dean Trew, Neal Engwall, Christie Sikora and others
Defendant:
Bobby Tinsley, Brian Quimby, Skuxchange, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv02807
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
D'Amico v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Robert Smith, Joseph Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Steven F. D'Amico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forney v. Warden Robert Smith
as 3:2018cv01164
Respondent:
Warden Robert Smith
Petitioner:
James M Forney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Floyd v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv01729
Plaintiff:
Dennis Floyd
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Daniel Conn, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulk v. Jones et al
as 8:2017cv01459
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anton Faulk
Defendant:
h Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Robert Smith, B. Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Humana at Home 1, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Humana at Home 1, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Farquharson et al v. Hansell et al
as 6:2016cv00745
Plaintiff:
Beulah Farquharson and Earlton Farquharson
Defendant:
Robert (Bob) E. Hansell, Osceola County Sheriff's Office, Michael Furey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Swanson v. Evans et al
as 2:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
David Swanson, J.R.
Defendant:
John Evans, III, Amanda Hutchison, Erich Zercher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
