Cases 1 - 10 of 1,783
Zameeruddin, Rizvana v. University of Wisconsin-Parkside et al
as 3:2024cv00654
Defendant:
University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Scott Menke and others
Plaintiff:
Rizvana Zameeruddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Albolino
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Officer K Albolino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Argonaut Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hyatt v. Evers et al
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant:
Tim Malchow, James Schwochert, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wildman v. Oshkosh Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2024cv01155
Defendant:
Oshkosh Correctional Institution, Nurse Steuber and Dr Murphy
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wildman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Versey et al v. Ebert et al
as 2:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Whytwan Versey and Jacqueline Washington
Defendant:
Robert Roembke, Justin Jolliff, Casey Ebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Carr et al
as 2:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Harmon
Defendant:
Dr Panos, Robert Weinman, Brad Hompe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Robert Richard Underwood
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01128
Defendant:
Sgt Gail, CO Prosper, Sgt Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
