Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Borders v. Lafayett Police Deportment The et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Borders
Defendant:
Lafayett Police Deportment The, Ian O'Shields and Robison
Not Yet Classified:
BRANCHVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Robison et al
as 3:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Javenta Chapman and Javentay Chapman
Defendant:
Robison, Porter, Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. ZOELLER et al
as 1:2017cv02949
Defendant:
KELLY S. BENJAMIN, WILLIAM M. NASH, LYNDA K. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2017cv04040
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R Watson
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Stephanie Dorethy, Chris McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrazek v. Herman et al
as 1:2015cv01261
Plaintiff:
Craig Mrazek
Defendant:
Vicki Herman, Bret Robison, . Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broaddus v. Pyle et al
as 1:2014cv01299
Plaintiff:
Shawn E Broaddus
Defendant:
. Pyle, . Leipold, Kent Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Hansen et al
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Salvador Godinez, Jesse Mortgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBISON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2014cv00130
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MELVIN ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2014cv01059
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith McKinney
Defendant:
. Carpenter, . Abernathy, . Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton v Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Delmas Sexton, II
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction and Sara Robison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
