Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kirschenbaum v. Kingsford et al
as 1:2017cv01838
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Kirschenbaum
Defendant:
Eliza Kingsford , Penguin Random House, LLC and Rodale, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cannon v. Rodale Inc.
as 1:2017cv02408
Plaintiff:
Bill Cannon
Defendant:
Rodale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kanongataa v. Rodale Inc.
as 1:2016cv08293
Plaintiff:
Kali Kanongataa
Defendant:
Rodale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
RODALE INC. v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2013cv02756
Plaintiff:
RODALE INC.
Defendant:
MARK ROBERTS, FUNK ROBERTS FITNESS and SPARTACUSWORKOUT.COM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RODALE INC. v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2012cv04493
Plaintiff:
RODALE INC.
Defendant:
MARK ROBERTS, FUNK ROBERTS FITNESS and SPARTACUSWORKOUT.COM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. , ABP Corporation , Bojangle's Restaurants Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Doctor's Associates Inc , Kraft Foods Inc. and Rodale, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Innovations, Inc.
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc. , ALM Media Properties, LLC , Amazon.Com, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Demand Media, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Beneficial Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
RODALE INC. v. JOHNSTON et al
as 5:2010cv05607
Plaintiff:
RODALE INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES JOHNSTON, MYKRO COM CO. and IN RE: THE DOMAIN NAME
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
RODALE INC. v. MENS HEALTH 4 et al
as 5:2010cv05446
Plaintiff:
RODALE INC.
Defendant:
MENS HEALTH 4, MENS HEALTH 5, MENS HEALTH 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pumpone LLC v. Rodale Inc.
as 1:2010cv04781
Plaintiff:
Pumpone LLC
Defendant:
Rodale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
