Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Howard Tillman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BLAKE TILLMAN, named as Sir Howard Blake Tillman II
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, R. CARR, Deputy Warden, TEDESCO, Unknown: named as John and Jane Doe Tedesco, Correctional Officer II and others
Murray Hooper v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99012
Petitioner / Appellant:
MURRAY HOOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry, STACI IBARRA, Warden, Eyman Prison and RODNEY CARR, Warden, Florence Prison
Hooper v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01935
Petitioner:
Murray Hooper
Respondent:
David Shinn, Staci Ibarra and Rodney Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Rodney Carr, et al
as 20-16666
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM HENRY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, CANO, Unknown; CO II, Guard SMU 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Alsaud v. Carr et al
as 2:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Rodney Carr, Unknown Young, Unknown Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bearup v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05828
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wade Bearup and Patrick W Bearup
Defendant:
Rodney Carr, Sharon Kary, Jessica Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2016cv06804
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Patrick
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, Amy Campenelli, Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macker v. Carr et al
as 1:2016cv06751
Plaintiff:
Edward Macker, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Carr, Jackson, Celia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Fry et al
as 1:2008cv02894
Plaintiff:
Javier P Bailey
Defendant:
Rita A Fry, Louis Caprio, Edwin A Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
