Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brent Beckway v. Paul De Shong, et al
as 12-16286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT BECKWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL DE SHONG, Deputy, RODNEY K. MITCHELL, Sheriff, COUNTY OF LAKE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Brent Beckway v. Paul De Shong, et al
as 12-16290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRENT BECKWAY
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL DE SHONG, Deputy and RICHARD WARD, Deputy
Defendant:
RODNEY K. MITCHELL, Sheriff, COUNTY OF LAKE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and COUNTY OF LAKE
Michael Seals v. Rodney Mitchell, et al
as 11-16356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL IZELL SEALS
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY K. MITCHELL, RUSSELL E. PERDOCK, Chief Deputy, JAMES BAUMEN and others
Seals v. mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Michael Izell Seals
Defendant:
rodney k mitchell and John Rynhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinius v. Perdock et al
as 3:2010cv03498
Plaintiff:
Bismarck F. Dinius
Defendant:
Russell E. Perdock, Rodney K. Mitchell, Jon E. Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seals v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2004cv03764
Plaintiff:
Michael Izell Seals
Defendant:
Rodney K. Mitchell, Russell E. Perdock, James Baumen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Seals v. John Russell, et al
as 08-16262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SEALS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN RUSSELL, Officer, JAMES BAUMAN, JASON SESTITO and others
Tom Brown, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 08-16083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MULTI DENOMINATIONAL MINISTRY OF CANNABIS AND RASTAFARI, INC., LINDA SENTI, Rev., TOM BROWN, Rev. and others
Appellant:
CHARLES E. LEPP, Personal Representative of Linda Senti
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, KAREN TANDY, Administrator DEA, SCOTT MCGREGOR, U.S. Attorney and others
Michael Seals v. John Russell, et al
as 08-16079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SEALS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN RUSSELL, Officer, JAMES BAUMAN, JASON SESTITO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
