Cases 31 - 40 of 1,617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv03835
Petitioner:
Jason Dominik Tyler Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Marsh-Leigh v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16416
Plaintiff:
Zoe Marsh-Leigh
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Steve Berlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03793
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montano-Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv01431
Petitioner:
Gabriel Montano-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez v. Dust
as 1:2023cv16261
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Denise Dust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rodriguez v. Dust
as 2:2023cv02264
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Denise K Dust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv16128
Plaintiff:
Juana Diaz Pacheco and Jose Rodriguez Collazo
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dynacom Management LLC et al v. United States Liability Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv15996
Plaintiff:
Dynacom Management LLC, Ali Setork and Mina Setork
Defendant:
United States Liability Insurance Company, Rodolfo Lechuga, Luis Manuel Rodriguez-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
