Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Javier J. Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Cuevas-Ramos, Carmen Ramona Natal-Perez, Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Isaac v. US
as 23-1916
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMANUEL RODRIGUEZ-ISAAC
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Whyte-Cohen v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv12609
Plaintiff:
Dequann Whyte-Cohen
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, MR Christopher Braley, Joshua Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Then v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2023cv12147
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Rodriguez Then
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez-Santos v. USA
as 3:2023cv01475
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Rodriguez-Santos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Rivera-Pagan
as 3:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Javier J Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Roberto Rivera-Pagan and Ariana Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crespo-Morales v. Caro-Delgado
as 23-1729
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN M. CRESPO-MORALES
Respondent / Appellee:
NICANOR CARO-DELGADO
Respondent:
CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
