Cases 41 - 50 of 280
RODRIGUEZ v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
LEWIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and SUPERINTENDANT DERICK OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rodriguez-Francisco v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
B. Thompson, Herman Quay, III and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez-Francisco v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01180
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALVADOR-RODRIGUEZ v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv00757
Defendant:
C/O JONES and C/O FERGUSON
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL SALVADOR-RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kane v. Schuylkill County Prison et al
as 3:2021cv00936
Defendant:
Eugene Wapinski, Schuylkill County Prison, Alex Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Finley et al
as 1:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Defendant:
FNU, LNU Chaplain, Associate Warden Berkishier, Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Cline et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Axel Rivera Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sgt. Cline, Warden Briggs and Mark Seibert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv00787
Petitioner:
JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MR. OBERLANDER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODRIGUEZ v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00034
Respondent:
L.T. PARTSCH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCI ALBION SUPT. MICHAEL CLARK and others
Petitioner:
GERMAN BERMUDEZ RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Bradley
as 3:2021cv00056
Petitioner:
Henry Rodriguez
Respondent:
Eric Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
