Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Segal et al v. Maryland State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2018cv02731
Defendant: Maryland State Board of Elections and Linda Lamone
Plaintiff: Jerome Segal, Michael Hodge and Peter Roemer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roemer v. The Chapman Law Firm, PA
as 1:2018cv22168
Plaintiff: Robert Roemer
Defendant: The Chapman Law Firm, PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06753
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Judicial Subpoena Duces Tecum to United States Attorney's Office in James Roemer v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2016mc01372
In Re: Judicial Subpoena Duces Tecum to United States Attorney's Office in James Roemer v. The State of New York
Petitioner: United States of America
Roemer Industries, Inc. v. NLRB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2109
Petitioner Cross-Respondent: ROEMER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Respondent Cross-Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Scatchell v. Gruber et al
as 1:2015cv07228
Plaintiff: Gianna Scatchell
Defendant: Richard C Gruber and Kevin Roemer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Roemer Industries, Inc. v. NLRB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1917
Petitioner: ROEMER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Roemer v. Zimmer Inc et al
as WIE/2:14-cv-00185
Plaintiff: Thomas Roemer
Defendant: Zimmer Inc , Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Jim Roemer Transport, LLC et al v. Wabasha, City of
as 0:2013cv01706
Plaintiff: Jim Roemer Transport, LLC , James Roemer and Mary Roemer
Defendant: Wabasha, City of
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roemer, III et al
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: William J. Roemer, III, John F. Hughes and Roemer & Hughes Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?