Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PARSONS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02888
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SETH WILLIAMS, CHRISTINA GIARDINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DOE v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2017cv01249
Plaintiff:
JOEL DOE , MACY ROE , MARY SMITH and others
Defendant:
BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. RICHARD FAIDLEY, DR. BRETT COOPER and others
Movant:
AIDAN DESTEFANO and PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH CONGRESS FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIRTH et al v. ZIMMER, INC., et al
as 5:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
MARY WIRTH and DAVID WIRTH
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ATKINS et al v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE et al
as 2:2016cv04503
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ATKINS , ANDREW DUREN and JOEL DAVENPORT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, PHOENIXVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT JOHN ROES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORLINA v. DOE et al
as 2:2016cv02696
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY FORLINA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JAMES MORACE, DONALD ALLABAND, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUGLAS v. WOMEN OF HOPE et al
as 2:2015cv06654
Plaintiff:
LOLITA DUGLAS
Defendant:
WOMEN OF HOPE, THE CITY, ROE CHETALO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. KERRY et al
as 2:2015cv05983
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY , JOHN DOE, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
