Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Collier v. BP America Production Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00593
Plaintiff:
Reed Collier , Glenn Nelson , Michael Beech and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company, Inc. , Edmund Thompson , Joseph Lobo and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles v. PCC Technical Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01626
Cross Defendant:
Sophie Weisenberg, Lexington Steel Corporation, S & W Atlas Iron & Metal Co Inc and others
Defendant:
Thomas K Skinker, Hillside Industries, Inc.,, PCC Technical Industries, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Shama, A General Partnership, Enerfab Inc, Shama, LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Richard Meruelo, Blue Tee Corporation, Lexwest LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
Counter Defendant:
Estate of Lester Finkelstein, Roes and Bishopric Products Company
Counter Claimant:
Lester Ruben Corporation No. 2, Southwest Steel Rolling Mills, Lester Ruben Corporation No. 1 and others
Not Classified By Court:
Timothy VP Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
B.G.N. Fremont Square Ltd. v. Chang H. Chung et al
as 2:2010cv09749
Counter Defendant:
B.G.N. Fremont Square Ltd.
Plaintiff:
B.G.N. Fremont Square Ltd.
Cross Defendant:
Chang H. Chung, Jeung H. Chung, Donald G. Edwards and others
Defendant:
Chang H. Chung, Jeung H. Chung, Donald G. Edwards and others
Counter Claimant:
Fremont-Peacock Cleaners, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Fremont-Peacock Cleaners, Inc.
Searles Valley Minerals Operations Inc v. Advanced Steel Recovery Inc et al
as 5:2010cv01403
Counter Claimant:
AG Transport, Advanced Steel Recovery Inc, Advanced Steel Recovery LLC and others
Defendant:
AG Transport, Advanced Steel Recovery Inc, J&J Cleanup Service and others
Counter Defendant:
Does, Does, Roes and others
Cross Claimant:
J&J Cleanup Service
Cross Defendant:
Moes and Searles Valley Minerals Operations Inc
Plaintiff:
Searles Valley Minerals Operations Inc
Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority et al
as 2:2010cv02703
Defendant:
DOES, Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority Board and others
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board and ROES
Plaintiff:
Neighbors for Smart Rail
Golden Gate Way, LLC v. Stewart et al
as 4:2009cv04458
Plaintiff:
Golden Gate Way, LLC
Defendant:
Jeanne Stewart , Jeanne's Hamlin Cleaners , Leonard A. Gross and others
3rd_party_defendant:
Roes 1-100
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Jeanne Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 09-1623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 09-1623
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROFESSORS, AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY and others
Fairchild Holding Corp v. Aerojet-General Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00722
Defendant:
Winco Enterprises Inc, Azusa Land Reclamation Co Inc and Alcoa Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Winco Enterprises, Inc., Wynn Oil Company, Chemical Waste Management Inc and others
Cross Defendant:
Alcoa, Inc. and Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Fairchild Corp, ROES 1 through 10 and Fairchild Corp.
Plaintiff:
The Fairchild Corporation, Sheepdog, Inc. and Fairchild Holding Corp
Counter Defendant:
ROES, Fairchild Corporation and Roes 3 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
