Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Ben v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv00370
Plaintiff:
Sheila K. Ben
Defendant:
United States of America , Federal Probation Office of the Syracuse Office of the Northern District of New York , Matthew Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bien-Aime v. Chrysler et al
as 6:2013cv01277
Plaintiff:
Chantal Bien-Aime
Defendant:
Mark Chrysler , Robert M. Maciol , Richard Roe and others
Cross_claimant:
The County of Oneida, New York , Robert M. Maciol and Mark Chrysler
Cross_defendant:
Kevin Beach , John Doe , Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jendrzejczak v. Williams et al
as 6:2013cv01239
Plaintiff:
Vincent Jendrzejczak
Defendant:
Dennis Williams, Brian Roe and Kelly Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01065
Plaintiff:
Mindy Roe
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Beilein et al
as 9:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
John H. White
Defendant:
Thomas A. Beilein, Daniel L. Stewart, Phyllis Harrison-Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Howard et al
as 9:2012cv01372
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Defendant:
T. Howard, R. Rhondo, B. Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charron et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Charron , Denise Charron and Mark Laurange
Defendant:
David W. Harrison, Jr. , John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roman v. Bejjani et al
as 6:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roberta Roman
Defendant:
Fadi J. Bejjani, Cedars Minimally Invasive Surgical Suite, P.C., Copps Medical, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
