Cases filed in Texas
Cases 71 - 80 of 128
Doe et al v. Aransas County et al
as 2:2014cv00392
Plaintiff: Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Defendant: Aransas County, Roman Cortez and Paul Noel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clow v. Sheraton Hotel et al
as 4:2014mc02252
Plaintiff: Lorna Renee Clow
Defendant: Sheraton Hotel and Lourdes Roe
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv02703
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doe v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv00840
Defendant: Eduardo Carmona, Corrections Corporation of America and Officer John Roe
Plaintiff: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe et al v. Wade et al
as 4:2014cv00356
Plaintiff: Deborah Roe, Philadelphia Daily News and David Rothrock
Defendant: Dwayne Wade, NBA, Vanessa Stiviano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff: Alishe Roe
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krohn v. Stipp et al
as 3:2014mc00062
Movant: James L. Moore
Plaintiff: Shelley D Krohn
Defendant: Mitchell D Stipp, MSJM Advisors LLC, Stipp Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AutoOpt Networks Inc v. GTL USA Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01252
Plaintiff: AutoOpt Networks, Inc.
Defendant: GTL USA, Inc. , GTL International LTD. , GTL LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Roe v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00024
Petitioner: Nicholas Lee Roe
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salazar v. Officer John Roe et al
as 5:2014cv00016
Plaintiff: Rogelio Salazar
Defendant: Officer John Roe, Other Unknown Officers and City Of Laredo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?