Cases 21 - 30 of 189
Jones v. Guyton et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Qwanell S Jones
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Jones, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gorsi et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Shamaila Gorsi, Jana Huston, Carrie Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00095
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Sam Roe
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Guyton et al
as 1:2021cv01331
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Turner, . Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roe v. Lombardo et al
as 3:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rosen and Regina Lombardo
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Roe v. Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC
as 1:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Roe and Allen Spradling
Defendant:
Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC, Scai Holdings, LLC, John Does and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Roe v. Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07269
Defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cliffton Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Chicago Freedom School et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv03718
Plaintiff:
Chicago Freedom School, Tony Alvarado-Rivera and Jacqulyn Hamilton
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, BACP Investigator Joseph W Sneed, BACP Investigator Ira Navarro, #338 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Malkowski et al.
as 1:2019cv07211
Defendant:
Medical Technician Bobby, Mary Ellen Grennan, Unknown Health Care Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
