Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Doe v. Texas Christian University et al
as 4:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Texas Christian University and Victor J. Boschini, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jane Roe
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Roe v. Snap, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Snap, Inc. dba Snapchat LLC and Snap LLC, Bonnie Guess-Mazock, Conroe Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. Tom Green County Detention Facility
as 6:2021cv00067
Petitioner:
Bannon D Roe
Respondent:
Tom Green County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01122
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zorikova v. Gish et al
as 3:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Alla Zorikova
Defendant:
Casey Gish, Jamie Gregory, Christina Sato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lumpkin v. Kaufman County Jail
as 3:2021cv01842
Plaintiff:
Kiriath Lumpkin
Defendant:
Kaufman Couty Jail, Kaufman County Jail, Kaufman County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervini et al v. Stapp et al
as 1:2021cv00568
Defendant:
Chase Stapp, Rachel Roes, Richard Roes and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cervini, Timothy Holloway, Wendy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gallagher v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2020cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jason Gallagher
Defendant:
John Roe, John Doe, John Foe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zokaei v. Fundamental Sports Management, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00775
Defendant:
ROE-BRG Investments, LLC, Nicolas LaHood, Rahul Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Mayar Zokaei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00774
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
