Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Tyrone Henry v. Richard Miranda, et al
as 11-17315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE VAUGHN HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MIRANDA, in his official capacity as chief, TONY SABORI, an individual, ROGER VANDERPOOL, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Curtis Bohnert v. J. Mitchell, et al
as 11-15145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS BOHNERT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MITCHELL, GEORGE A. BURKE, KEVIN CARR and others
Gaona v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2011cv08007
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gaona
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Roger Vanderpool, Page, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Bohnert v. J. Mitchell, et al
as 10-17385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS BOHNERT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MITCHELL, GEORGE A. BURKE, KEVIN CARR and others
Gutenkauf v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Gutenkauf
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Hugh Hallman, Unknown Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Richard Neal, et al v. Robert Devries, et al
as 10-15364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LELAND NEAL and REX CARL SAGELY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT DEVRIES, Kingman Chief of Police, STATE OF ARIZONA, body Politic, TOM SHEAHAN, Mohave County Sheriff and others
Lynnell Levingston v. Patricia Piburn, et al
as 10-15283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNNELL LEVINGSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA PIBURN, STEVE WEST, DAVID GREGORY and others
Estrada v. Montgomery et al
as 4:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Andres Efren Estrada
Defendant:
Kathleen Montgomery, Department of Public Safety and Roger Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal et al v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2009cv01944
Plaintiff:
Richard Leland Neal and Rex Carl Sagely
Defendant:
State of Arizona, Robert Devries, Tom Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
