Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Denise Rohan et al v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Denise Rohan, Nathan Rohan, Sandra Yankow and others
Defendant:
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. and Mazda Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ball v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Rohan Ball
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
BALL v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BALL
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khan v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv02168
Plaintiff:
Raffique N. Khan
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor of NYC Eric L. Adams, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Christopher Brent Rohan v. Martin O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brent Rohan
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hankerson et al v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hankerson and Rohan Ron Hankerson
Defendant:
Bank Of America, Commissioner Bank of America, District Court of Queens, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
