Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Does John Does 108-113 and Jane Does 108-109
Defendant:
Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl doing business as Maxus Inc doing business as Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated doing business as Trinity Behavioral Healthcare Systems Inc doing business as Lord's Ranch, Maxus Inc doing business as Lord's Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Does Jane Does 101-107 and John Does 101-107
Defendant:
Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl individually and doing business as Maxus Inc on behalf of Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated on behalf of Trinity Behavioral Healthcare Systems Inc on behalf of Lord's Ranch, Maxus Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Does John Does 17-30 and John Does
Defendant:
Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl doing business as Maxus Inc doing business as Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated doing business as Trinity Behavorial Healthcare Systems Inc doing business as Lords Ranch, Maxus Inc doing business as Lords Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Defendant:
John Does, Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl doing business as Maxus Inc doing business as Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated doing business as Trinity Behavioral Healthcare Systems Inc doing business as Lord's Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
John Does
Defendant:
Emmett A Presley, Theodore E Suhl Individually doing business as Maxus Inc doing business as Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated doing business as Trinity Behavioral Healthcare Systems INC doing business as Lord's Ranch, Maxus Inc Individually doing business as Lord's Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
as 4:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
United States of America v. 2019 Black Mercedes-Benz 3500XD Crew, VIN: WD4PF4CDXKP155500, et al
as 2:2021cv02189
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2019 Black Mercedes-Benz 3500XD Crew, VIN: WD4PF4CDXKP155500,, 2017 White Tesla Model X, VIN: 5YJXCAE48HF075775:, 1962 Red/Cream Chevrolet Impala, VIN: 21769K160645 and others
Claimant:
Brant Jolly, James J. Taylor, Jr., Celesta Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Hicks v. Frito-Lay Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
David Hicks
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jenkins v. How Do You Roll of Conway Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00730
Plaintiff:
Melinda Jenkins
Defendant:
How Do You Roll of Conway Inc , Rock Roll LLC , Aaron Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Benefield et al v. Convacare Management Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00589
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Benefield , Veatrice Childress , Janis Franks and others
Defendant:
Convacare Management Inc , Rolling Hills HC Inc , Joey Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
