Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GUILIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BT BRANDS, INC. et al v. NOBLE ROMAN'S INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01352
Plaintiff:
BT Brands, Inc. and Gary Copperud
Defendant:
NOBLE ROMAN'S INC., A. Scott Mobley, Paul W. Mobley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FRENCH v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN LAMONT FRENCH
Defendant:
WARDEN, BYRD, KIM HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRENCH v. VOIGHTSCHILD et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN FRENCH
Defendant:
M VOIGHTSCHILD, EWERS, PARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARNER v. MCNAIRY COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2022cv01755
Petitioner:
ROMAN E. WARNER
Respondent:
MCNAIRY COUNTY COURT, STATE OF TENNESSEE and REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOPEZ v. NATOLI et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
ROMAN NATOLI and METHODIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
L.W. et al v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02397
Plaintiff:
L. W., J. P. and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC. and RONCALLI HIGH SCHOOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
