Cases 1 - 10 of 294
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DONG v. JADDOU et al
as 5:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
SHENG FENG DONG
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HUANG v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv01418
Plaintiff:
GUI HUA HUANG
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ROMERO v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv01423
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CAMMARATA v. DONNELLY et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMMARATA
Defendant:
JOHN V. DONNELLY, III, CHAD F. KENNEY, DAVID J. IGNALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Romero
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
