Cases 21 - 30 of 215
Romero #231853 v. Centurion of Arizona LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Davis Michael Romero
Defendant:
Centurion of Arizona LLC, Unknown Steward and Unknown Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Valdez et al
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Unknown Valdez, Unknown Patterson, Unknown Marsk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phifer v. Boncoskey et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Scott Boncoskey, Todd Romero and Seth Turken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Charish Nicole Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romero #199403 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paul Romero
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Sochor
Defendant:
Kenneth Bradshaw, Ariel Monge, Unknown Heisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaheed-Muhammad, #148986 v. Centurion Arizona et al
as 2:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad
Defendant:
Centurion Arizona, Unknown Stickley, Unknown Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01039
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Petitioner:
Carlos B Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
