Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diehl et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Diehl, Tylor Young, April McElroy and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Richard F McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Schrock v. Romero et al
as 3:2019cv00629
Defendant:
Robert D Bugher, Leonard, B Romero and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Schrock, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Romero v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00796
Petitioner:
Eduardo Perez-Romero
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nino-Romero v. Superintendent
as 3:2014cv02037
Petitioner:
Gerardo Nino-Romero
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Veronica Romero and Mayra Yvette Rivera
Defendant:
Michael A. Brown , William C. VanNess, II and Gregory F Zoeller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Romero v. Refinery Bar and Grill Inc The
as 2:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Mark Romero
Defendant:
Refinery Bar and Grill Inc The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. Montenegro
as 2:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert M Romero
Defendant:
Alfredo Montenegro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Romero v. USA
as 3:2009cv00189
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ralph A Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romero et al v. Scotland Oil Company et al
as 2:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Pedro Romero, Pedro Romero, Maria Carmen Romero and others
Defendant:
Scotland Oil Company and Ron M Brennan
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
