Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vicky Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster, Karen Frye and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster, Karen Frye and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00814
Plaintiff:
Forrest, Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Britton v. Village Capital & Investment, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00349
Defendant:
Village Capital & Investment, LLC
Petitioner:
Daniel Brian Britton
Receiver:
Ron Hughes
Respondent:
Kimberly Scruggs Britton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Columbus v. Scott et al
as 1:2019cv06722
Plaintiff:
Joseph Columbus
Defendant:
Pinpoint Technologies, LLC, Carolyn Daley Scott, Ronald Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno et al v. Hughes
as 4:2014cv13829
Plaintiff:
Erica Moreno and Katti Putnam
Defendant:
Ron Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casares v. BGNS Corp.
as 2:2014cv14141
Plaintiff:
Manuel J. Casares
Defendant:
BGNS Corp., Estate of Ron Hughes, Kay Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antwaren Roberts v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv07461
#71326:
M Blankenship
#75622:
G Calderon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Does, Arbi Mashi Kamali and others
#74448:
B Camack
#77625:
S Holder
#44815:
Ron Hughes and K Smith
#70462:
Todd Lansford
#79734:
E Nixon
#71336:
E Perez
#57029:
E Ramos
Plaintiff:
Antwaren Roberts
#56159:
T Rodin
#76993:
A Rodriguez
#59309:
D Soto
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
