Cases 31 - 34 of 34
Jonathan Riches v. General Re Corp
as 08-7322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GARAND, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL RE CORP and RONALD FERGUSON
Riches et al v. General Re Corp et al
as 2:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Christopher Garand
Defendant:
General Re Corp and Ronald Ferguson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IN RE American International Group, Inc Securities Litigation
as 1:2004cv08141
Lead Plaintiff:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Feder and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jerome Noll, Stephan Frank, Joseph Scuilla and others
Appellant:
Alan Rothstein, Marisa Rothstein, Mollye Rothstein and others
Petitioner:
THE STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, CUSTODIAN OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MICHIGAN STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AN, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, The Reynolds Group and others
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
State of New York Attorney General Office and Marshall Orloff
Not Classified By Court:
Margaret B. Amidei, KAREN J MICHAELS, Lee Janovits and others
Interested Party:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Amicus Curiae:
North American Securties Administrators Association, Inc.
Intervenor:
Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund and James Connolly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ferguson v. Schlumberger Limited
as 4:2003cv05428
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ferguson
Defendant:
Schlumberger Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
