Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Ronald Emrit v. Sabine Jules
as 23-10415
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: SABINE AISHA JULES
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 1:2023cv21315
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Attorney Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ronald Emrit v. Sabine Jules
as 23-10430
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: SABINE AISHA JULES
Ronald Emrit v. Sabine Jules
as 23-10450
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: SABINE AISHA JULES
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv20847
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Charles Barkley, Subway, Fandvel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Barkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Charles Barkley, Subway and Fanduel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?