Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07006
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RONALD TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wesley et al v. The Catalyst Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00376
Plaintiff: Rasheena Wesley , Syreeta Wesley , Anklav Dwyer and others
Defendant: The Catalyst Capital Group, Inc., Natural Markets Food Group, Natural Market Restaurant Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2100 WARN ACT
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Tate v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv02390
Plaintiff: Ronald Tate
Defendant: Kela E Thomas and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Benson et al
as 1:2012cv01129
Plaintiff: Ronald Tate
Defendant: Joseph Benson and Mark Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. USA
as 1:2012cv00918
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Ronald Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Ronald Tate
as 12-2027
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD TATE
TATE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00096
Plaintiff: RONALD TATE, SR and RONALD TATE, JR
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
TATE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2011cv00210
Plaintiff: RONALD TATE, SR and RONALD TATE, JR
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bolden v. Detroit, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv14822
Plaintiff: Michael Bolden
Defendant: Detroit, City of, Detroit Police Department, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and others
Spady et al v. Wesley College We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00834
Plaintiff: Christine M. Spady, Ronald Tate, James Frasier and others
Defendant: Wesley College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?