Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Rayford v. Scholfield et al
as 1:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ercil K. Rayford
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Candace Wiseman, Toney Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Schofield, et al
as 1:2015cv01189
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Clifton
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield , Charles Traughber, Richard Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clifton v. Schofield, et al
as 3:2014cv01469
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Clifton
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield , Charles Traughber, Richard Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Murdock v. Bruce et al
as 3:2012cv01244
Plaintiff:
Marshall H. Murdock
Defendant:
Patsy Bruce, Yusuf A. Hakeem, Ronnie Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Cole
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Charles Traughber, Yusef A. Hakeem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Traughber et al
as 3:2011cv01222
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ford
Defendant:
Charles Traughber, Yusuf A. Hakeem, Ronnie Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Tennessee Board of Paroles et al
as 3:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Davis
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Paroles, Patricia Merritt, Colis Newble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Sexton et al
as 3:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
William H. Taylor
Defendant:
David Sexton, State of Tennessee, TN Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drumbarger v. Crosby et al
as 3:2011cv00684
Plaintiff:
William Lee Drumbarger
Defendant:
Jim Crosby, Robert Irvin, William Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayborn v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02137
Plaintiff:
Glen Clayborn
Defendant:
State of Tennessee , Charles Traughber , James Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
