Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Kerstein et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Gary Kerstein, Tracy Bennett, Emma C Hatchett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Wesley W Hughes
Defendant:
Michelle Gray, Steven Rickette, K Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bennett et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Tracy Bennett, Gary Kerstine, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Peirce et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Zeckeya Perry
Defendant:
Robert Peirce, Clyde Daniel, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
