Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Rosales v. Nathan
as 4:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosales
Defendant:
Paul H. Nathan, Jr.
Counter Claimant:
Paul H Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Tamika Tate et al v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2024cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tamika Tate and Audi Osborne
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, Officer J. Rosales, Officer M. Mckray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaun A. Jones v. C.O. Moisa et al
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Moisa, Sgt. John Doe One, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rosales v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06402
Plaintiff:
Robert Anatalio Rosales
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gray v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Gray
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carolina I. Rosales v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Carolina Ramirez Rosales
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
