Cases 31 - 40 of 52
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rosario
as 3:2015cv30083
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cruz Rosario
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rosario
as 3:2015cv30082
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cruz Rosario
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Klevisha v. Provident Funding Associates L.P.
as 1:2015cv10629
Plaintiff:
Rosario Klevisha
Defendant:
Provident Funding Associates L.P.
Counter_claimant:
Provident Funding Associates L.P.
Counter_defendant:
Rosario Klevisha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Olmo v. Narker et al
as 1:2014cv13434
Plaintiff:
John Ivan Olmo
Defendant:
Steven Narker, Judy Lee, Peter Chin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rosario-Wyatt v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
as 1:2014cv10789
Plaintiff:
Randy W Rosario-Wyatt
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosario v. Paul Revere Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv12633
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Rosario
Defendant:
Paul Revere Transportation, LLC , Richard J. Daley , Teamsters Local Union No. 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. Northeastern University Public Safety Police et al
as 1:2013cv11183
Plaintiff:
Cardrienne Turner
Defendant:
Northeastern University Public Safety Police, Lt. Detective Sargent Cassinelli, Joseph Auon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Del Rosario v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv30017
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Del Rosario
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rosario v. Roden et al
as 1:2012cv12172
Petitioner:
Jose Rosario
Respondent:
Gary Roden and Martha M. Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11539
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
