Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Pena v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2020cv03352
Defendant:
Wilfredo Ortiz, Maribel Rosario, Unknown Chicago Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United Food And Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund et al
as 1:2020cv03061
Plaintiff:
John A. Wagner, Jason Paradis, Richard D. Cox and others
Defendant:
Gepperth's Meat Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
United Food And Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund and its Trustees et al v. Miles Management Corp
as 1:2020cv02715
Plaintiff:
John A. Wagner, Jason Paradis, Richard D. Cox and others
Defendant:
Miles Management Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Rosario v. Thompson et al
as 3:2020cv00301
Defendant:
C/O Rodman, Jane Doe 1, S. Mercier and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Hammers et al
as 1:2020cv01029
Defendant:
Melissa Rivera, Jamie Wilson, Jennifer Meaker and others
Plaintiff:
Esteban Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00428
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rita Rosario Rodriguez and Rita R Rodriguez
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McClenon et al v. Postmates Inc.
as 1:2019cv06415
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Petitioner:
Adrian Aponte, Antonio Cordova, Alejandra Monsalve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
USA v. Jorge Rosario
as 19-2565
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE ROSARIO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Humes v. Rosario et al
as 3:2019cv03050
Plaintiff:
Robert Humes
Defendant:
Samuel Rosario, Kenny Wenslow and City of Springfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
